Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber mini-review September 4-13

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber mini-review September 4-13
From: Agustín K-ballo Bergé (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-09-04 15:36:28

On 9/4/2015 4:19 PM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> 2015-09-04 21:09 GMT+02:00 Agustín K-ballo Bergé <kaballo86_at_[hidden]>:
>
>> - All of `future` and `shared_future`
>> https://github.com/olk/boost-fiber/blob/master/include/boost/fiber/future/future.hpp
>>
>> - All of `shared_state`
>> https://github.com/olk/boost-fiber/blob/master/include/boost/fiber/future/detail/shared_state.hpp
>>
>> - All of `promise`
>> https://github.com/olk/boost-fiber/blob/master/include/boost/fiber/future/promise.hpp
>>
>> - All of `task_object`
>> https://github.com/olk/boost-fiber/blob/master/include/boost/fiber/future/detail/task_object.hpp
>>
>> For each of them, there is only one function that varies amongst
>> specializations. Moving common code to a helper base class will make the
>> code readable, easier to maintain, and reduce the bloating.
>>
>
> OK, you refer to template specializations of future, promise etc.
> I prefer to prevent additional indirections introduced by deriving from
> base classes

What additional indirections would deriving from a base class introduce?

Regards,
-- 
Agustín K-ballo Bergé.-
http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com