Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber mini-review September 4-13

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber mini-review September 4-13
From: Thomas Heller (thom.heller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-09-04 16:13:57

On 09/04/2015 09:51 PM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> 2015-09-04 21:39 GMT+02:00 Thomas Heller <thom.heller_at_[hidden]>:
>
>> The problematic portion in std::mutex/boost::mutex is exactly the missing
>> mechanism how to yield in the correct way. Even if you implement a
>> mechanism like in the blog post you mentioned, the problem hasn't been
>> solved.
>>
>
> why would be boost::this_fiber::yield() inappropriate?

It's inappropriate for anything not running in a boost fiber execution 
context.

>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>