Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber mini-review September 4-13

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber mini-review September 4-13
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-09-05 10:36:55

2015-09-05 16:28 GMT+02:00 Thomas Heller <thom.heller_at_[hidden]>:

>
> Thanks, that's what I was hoping for. I was just a little confused about
> Oliver's previous explanation. Furthermore I think it's correct to state
> that fibers always run concurrently (please note the subtile difference
> between parallelism and concurrency).
>

sorry - I just tried to show that fibers might behave different than threads
(e.g. fiber which get signaled via a condition-variable do not immediately
run
-> deferred to the next cooperative supension)
anyway the code is fixed accordingly