Re: [boost] [type_traits] New version in master

Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] New version in master
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-09-14 04:09:03

> Any particular reason why 'is_trivially_default_constructible' was not
> provided as just the functionally-equivalent of
> 'has_trivial_default_constructor'?

Ummm, that would be because I forgot about those :/

There are a few traits like that which have changed name between TR1 and 
C++11, and I guess we should provide the new names as aliases. When I 
get a chance I'll deal with it.

John.