|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Copyright-less licence references
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-09-16 18:11:46
Gavin Lambert <gavinl <at> compacsort.com> writes:
> It is perfectly valid for the copyright notice to never be updated, even
> if the file is changed substantially.
>
> It is *not* valid for the original notice to be modified without
> specific agreement by the original person. It is *not* valid to remove
> it entirely, as then you do not know that the license grant is valid or
> who made it. It is *not* valid to specify a non-legal-entity as the
> copyright holder (so you can't say "lib X contributors").
Would you care to add references to these claims? As far as I can tell this
is just your opinion.
Gennadiy
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk