Re: [boost] Boost.GSL?

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.GSL?
From: David Sankel (camior_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-09-24 20:20:59

On Sep 24, 2015 2:03 PM, "Andrey Semashev" <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
>
> On 24.09.2015 19:22, David Sankel wrote:
>> I floated the idea of including GSL in Boost as a distribution mechanism
to
>> Bjarne and he said he doesn't have any objection to the idea in
principle,
>> although he is hesitant to having to go through an extensive review
process
>> where some of these basic structures would change.
>>
>> What do you all think? Would it be appropriate and/or desirable to have a
>> Boost.GSL library?
>
>
> I didn't take a deep look into it but I'd like a clarification as to what
is being proposed.

I am not proposing that the guidelines be included in boost, only the
essential libraries.

-- David Sankel