Subject: Re: [boost] compact_optional -- prompting interest
From: Marcel Raad (raad_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-09-25 11:07:54
Andrzej Krzemienski wrote
> I would like to inquire if there would be an interest in Boost in another
> library for storing optional objects, but working under different design
> For the motivation and design rationale see this article:
> Any feedback is welcome.
Such a type would be extremely useful for me. This is exactly what I want
most of my optional<bool>'s and optional<int>'s to be.
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/compact-optional-prompting-interest-tp4680313p4680315.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk