Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [Hana] Integration with the regression Matrix
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-10-12 04:56:40

Next message: Hartmut Kaiser: "[boost] We need a coherent higher level parallelization story for C++ (was [thread] Is there a non-blocking future-destructor?)"
Previous message: Mikael Olenfalk: "Re: [boost] Do you know of standard implementation of async() that blocks on the future-destructor?"
In reply to: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [Hana] Integration with the regression Matrix"

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Robert Ramey
> Sent: 10 October 2015 15:16
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [Hana] Integration with the regression Matrix
>
> On 10/10/15 1:55 AM, Andrey Semashev wrote:
> > On 10.10.2015 01:05, Louis Dionne wrote:
> >>
> >> Also, before someone suggests using Boost.Build: I have been looking
> >> at the possibility of maintaining a separate Jamfile. However, the
> >> need to maintain two separate build systems is annoying, so I'd like
> >> to avoid it if possible.
> >
> > Others have addressed the need for supporting Boost.Build. I can add
> > that it is possible to create a Jamfile that will automatically
> > iterate over the test sources and need not updating at all. You can
> > find an example in Boost.Log:
> >
> > https://github.com/boostorg/log/blob/develop/test/Jamfile.v2
>
> Great, another cool idea to make jamfile even easier to figure out and debug!

Also sets a good example by documenting *why* warnings are disabled etc.

Too many jamfiles are write-only ;-)

Paul

---
Paul A. Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse
Kendal UK LA8 8AB
+44 (0) 1539 561830

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk