Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Do you know of standard implementation of async() that blocks on the future-destructor?
From: AgustÃn K-ballo BergÃ© (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-10-12 09:57:30

Next message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] Do you know of standard implementation of async() that blocks on the future-destructor?"
Previous message: Tom Kent: "[boost] Test Runner Crashing"
In reply to: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "[boost] Do you know of standard implementation of async() that blocks on the future-destructor?"
Next in thread: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] Do you know of standard implementation of async() that blocks on the future-destructor?"
Reply: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] Do you know of standard implementation of async() that blocks on the future-destructor?"

On 10/11/2015 9:02 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Hi,
>
> all is in the title.

Don't they all? Blocking in the future destructor is what the standard
mandates.

Regards,

-- 
Agustín K-ballo Bergé.-
http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk