|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Demand for Boost libraries - was Math tools polynomial enhancements
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-11-01 16:05:30
On 11/1/15 1:46 AM, John Maddock wrote:
> Of course this does nothing to detract from the ultimate coolness of the
> idea ;)
Well, maybe the coolness of an idea is inversely proportional to it's
impenetrability. After all, if it can't be implemented, there are no
unhappy users.
Robert Ramey
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk