Re: [boost] boost log memory leak? Maybe it is my wrong.

Subject: Re: [boost] boost log memory leak? Maybe it is my wrong.
From: Jefferyliangmh (liang_mh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-11-15 22:49:27


Many thanks andrey.semashev's reply. I send my demo application codes in BoostDemo.rar file.  "logger" is my wrapped module by win32 dll.  "BoostDemo" is my MFC test application,  call logger code written in CMainFrame::CMainFrame() fuction, like this :  AppLogger::log("this is test message").

Memory leak display in output windows when compiled BoostDemo application.
2015-11-16

2015-11-16 

Jefferyliangmh 



发件人：boost-request_at_[hidden]
发送时间：2015-11-16 01:00
主题：Boost Digest, Vol 4908, Issue 1
收件人："boost"<boost_at_[hidden]>
抄送：

Send Boost mailing list submissions to 
    boost_at_[hidden] 

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit 
    http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost 
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to 
    boost-request_at_[hidden] 

You can reach the person managing the list at 
    boost-owner_at_[hidden] 

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
than "Re: Contents of Boost digest..." 


The boost archives may be found at: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/ 

Today's Topics: 

   1. boost log memory leak? Maybe it is my wrong. 
      (=?UTF-8?B?5qKB5piO6L6J?=) 
   2. Re: boost log memory leak? Maybe it is my wrong. (Andrey Semashev) 
   3. Re: checking __INTEL_COMPILER == 9999 (Blower, Melanie) 
   4. Re: checking __INTEL_COMPILER == 9999 (Edward Diener) 


---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Message: 1 
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 19:31:28 +0800 
From: "=?UTF-8?B?5qKB5piO6L6J?="<liang_mh_at_[hidden]> 
To: "boost"<boost_at_[hidden]> 
Subject: [boost] boost log memory leak? Maybe it is my wrong. 
Message-ID: <220730f2.126658.15105c3ab0c.Coremail.liang_mh_at_[hidden]> 
Content-Type: text/plain;    charset="UTF-8" 

Way I want to use win32 dynamic link library encapsulates the boost.log, the wrapper DLL in MFC MSVC 2015 calls, memory leak in output window prompt; The same library in a console program calls, no such problems. 
I am very depressed. Who can help me? 

2015-11-14 


???  

------------------------------ 

Message: 2 
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 00:05:28 +0300 
From: Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> 
To: "boost_at_[hidden]" <boost_at_[hidden]> 
Subject: Re: [boost] boost log memory leak? Maybe it is my wrong. 
Message-ID: 
    <CAEhD+6BH=Lnw1ghLwOVarXbYGDBqoNygzcWnML+TtU7mVbB1zQ_at_[hidden]> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 

On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 2:31 PM, ??? <liang_mh_at_[hidden]> wrote: 
> Way I want to use win32 dynamic link library encapsulates the boost.log, the wrapper DLL in MFC MSVC 2015 calls, memory leak in output window prompt; The same library in a console program calls, no such problems. 
> I am very depressed. Who can help me? 

If you work with Boost.Log the same way in both cases then it's likely 
a problem in your code and not the library. Otherwise I can't help 
without a minimal working code sample. 


------------------------------ 

Message: 3 
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 13:05:27 +0000 
From: "Blower, Melanie" <melanie.blower_at_[hidden]> 
To: "boost_at_[hidden]" <boost_at_[hidden]> 
Subject: Re: [boost] checking __INTEL_COMPILER == 9999 
Message-ID: 
    <B3584E72CFEBED439A3ECA9BCE67A4EF40258FCC_at_[hidden]> 
     
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" 

Thanks for all your suggestions and replies, I will work it on the Intel side. To Edward, at the bottom of my first message there's info about one of the failure modes. 
--Melanie 



------------------------------ 

Message: 4 
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:43:25 -0500 
From: Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]> 
To: boost_at_[hidden] 
Subject: Re: [boost] checking __INTEL_COMPILER == 9999 
Message-ID: <n2a971$msb$1_at_[hidden]> 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed 

On 11/15/2015 8:05 AM, Blower, Melanie wrote: 
> Thanks for all your suggestions and replies, I will work it on the Intel side. To Edward, at the bottom of my first message there's info about one of the failure modes. 

Thanks, I see that now. 




------------------------------ 

Subject: Digest Footer 

_______________________________________________ 
Unsubscribe &amp; other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost 

------------------------------ 

End of Boost Digest, Vol 4908, Issue 1 
**************************************