Subject: Re: [boost] interest in an asynchronous linear algebra library?
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-11-22 14:30:40
> > Anyways, while HPX supports distributed computing, you don't have to
> > use it
> > for this. HPX can be used just fine for SMP style (local only)
> > applications
> > as well. In fact we have shown that by simply switching from
> > std::async/std::future to hpx::async/hpx::future you can achieve a
> > speedup
> > of up to a factor of 3-4 (depending on the application).
> This for example would be a reason for me to provide a default
> implementation using std::future that i can exchange by the hpx::
> versions using a preprocessor directive.
> is there a specific reason for that speedup? is there just less overhead
> of the implementation or is it improved scheduling of tasks?
It's mainly because of a) very efficient user level threading, and b) low
overhead synchronization primitives.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk