Subject: Re: [boost] [config] RFC PR 82
From: AgustÃn K-ballo BergÃ© (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-11-24 15:54:01
On 11/24/2015 5:20 PM, Andrey Semashev wrote:
>>> Ditto BOOST_HAS_UNION_TYPE_PUNNING_TRICK (doesn't any compiler support
>> 'I'm all with you on this one' but since 'it is not in the standard'
>> language purists will probably complain if it is used unconditionally...
> To some extent this is guaranteed by [class.union]/1 in C++11.
No, it isn't.
-- AgustÃn K-ballo BergÃ©.- http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk