Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [fiber] ready for next review
From: Agustín K-ballo Bergé (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-12-05 09:25:11

On 12/4/2015 11:48 AM, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:
> On 12/4/2015 4:47 AM, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
>> 2015-12-03 22:21 GMT+01:00 Agustín K-ballo Bergé <kaballo86_at_[hidden]>:
>>> Yes, in the documentation.
>> documentation might need some updates - my announcement was primarly
>> focused to the source code
> Fair enough, I was misguided by the "ready for next review" subject as
> well as the announcement that requests from the review have been
> addressed. This is obviously not the case, but we can still make a lot
> of progress based on source code adjustments only.

While tracing overload resolution inside the library, I noticed a
regression in the way rvalues are handled (some of the intervening are
not in Boost.Context). When an argument whose type is deduced as `T&&`
is used in a function type, like with `result_of`, it has to be
specified as `T&&`. If the rvalue reference is omitted then
cv-qualifiers will be dropped, and arrays and functions will turn into

Note this issue overlaps with already reported issues on incorrect
result type computations, and invalid decay-copying.


Agustín K-ballo Bergé.-

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at