Subject: Re: [boost] [BPM] Supporting an alternative to meta/libraries.json
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-04 13:56:33
> Should it be .boost.json instead of .boost?
I'd prefer it as .boost, no need for an extension.
> I find having such a directory at the root of every library annoying,
> since it clutters it.
Surely every Boost library providing an index.html at the root is equally
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/BPM-Supporting-an-alternative-to-meta-libraries-json-tp4682457p4682460.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk