Subject: Re: [boost] ATTENTION: Library requirements..
From: AgustÃn K-ballo BergÃ© (kaballo86_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-07 09:16:38
On 1/7/2016 11:05 AM, Artyom Beilis wrote:
>>> as being outdated.
>> That might address one of the reasons given for banning it, namely:
>> - Incompatible with some older browsers and some text based browsers.
>> What's your take on the remaining ones?
>> - Makes printing docs pages difficult.
>> - Often results in really bad user interface design.
>> - "It's just annoying in general."
>> - Makes docs maintenance by other than the original developer more
You snipped all the context in which I agree with what you are saying :)
> This is another reason why "banning" is bad, it is like banning exceptions
> in C++ is bad because some programmers do not aware of exception safety.
> It has very nice navigation bar that works very well and helps a lot in
> browsing. Yet if you disable JS you still get perfectly nice menus+navigation
> that work without any issues.
> If you take documentation sources in some kind of Json/XML or Markdown
> documentation it is very good.
> Some guys who really know about writing documentation (these behind Doxygen)
> it good and enhances the user experience, If you ban it you just don't do
> justice to all people who's major project is actually creating tools
> for documentation.
> the way stuff is done.
> be printable and usable without it.
+1 Very well put.
-- AgustÃn K-ballo BergÃ©.- http://talesofcpp.fusionfenix.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk