Subject: Re: [boost] ATTENTION: Library requirements..
From: Sam Kellett (samkellett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-08 05:11:56
On 8 January 2016 at 09:51, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>
> On 2016-01-08 12:40, Sam Kellett wrote:
>> On 8 January 2016 at 09:32, Rainer Deyke <rainerd_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 07.01.2016 18:11, Robert Ramey wrote:
>>>> b) syntax coloring for code examples
>>> static, so they can and should be statically colored. This means that
>> that's massively open to human error and adds a substantial workload on
>> dev which could be better spent (re)writing the actual documentation
>> content to a better level.
> Coloring is done automatically by QuickBook/BoostBook and doesn't require
> human intervention. I believe other source formats should also have this
> capability without involving JS.
> If you're writing plain HTML then yes, you would have to do this yourself,
> but that's just one of your problems as writing HTML is a pain in general.
> Probably, this is the reason why noone does this nowdays.
fair. sorry no experience with quickbook so didn't realise!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk