Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [tools/GSoC] static code analysis?
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-30 11:10:02

Next message: Noah: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] Interest in the missing smart pointer (that can target the stack)"
Previous message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] expected/result/etc"
In reply to: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [tools/GSoC] static code analysis?"

2016-01-30 14:34 GMT+01:00 Vicente J. Botet Escriba <
vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>:

> Are you suggesting to use clang-tidy as such and/or adding specific boost
> checks?
> If adding, which checks do you want to add?
>

clang-analyzer-<xyz> - more checks could be added on demand
probably boost might establish its own coding style

Next message: Noah: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] Interest in the missing smart pointer (that can target the stack)"
Previous message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] expected/result/etc"
In reply to: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [tools/GSoC] static code analysis?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk