Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] Interest in the missing smart pointer (that can target the stack)
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-30 22:12:24
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Rob Stewart <rob.stewart_at_[hidden]>
> On January 29, 2016 3:35:54 PM EST, Emil Dotchevski <
> emildotchevski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > The point of null deleter is specifically to be able to use shared_ptr
> > in
> > cases when it isn't possible for shared_ptr to control the lifetime of
> > the
> > object. I don't think of the lack of safety as a disadvantage, it's a
> > feature.
> I wouldn't go that far, but you're right that it's an example of "trust
> the programmer."
OK, don't go that far :) but regardless, we've deduced that my example
shows proper use of null_deleter, in fact there is no other use case for
null_deleter except to do just this, given that we're in agreement that its
use with global objects is not safer than its use with local objects.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk