Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] Interest in the missing smart pointer (that can target the stack)
From: Seth (bugs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-31 10:16:39

On 31-01-16 07:56, Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> but this is valid technique when using
> shared_ptr.

I think people would just like a semantic wrapper that has a name
clarifying the purpose. So it's clear how use it is intended to be used
(and doesn't increase job security!)

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at