Subject: Re: [boost] [MSM] Is there any interest in C++14 Boost.MSM-eUML like library which compiles up to 60x quicker whilst being a slightly faster too?
From: Kris (krzysztof_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-02-03 16:32:04
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Christophe Henry-2 [via Boost] <
> >Moreover, I'm not sure how to disable the slowing down options such as
> deffered events etc.?
> I would be surprised if deferred events costed much compile time.
> Yea, I agree that compilation time should not be affected. However a
runtime performance could have, right?
I was asking becuase it can be clearly seen that eUML2 is ~5 times slower
than eUML (17ms vs 100ms) and
therefore I assumed that not the same back-end is used, in a sens, that is
less optimized, because it has
some features enabled by default.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> To unsubscribe from [MSM] Is there any interest in C++14 Boost.MSM-eUML
> like library which compiles up to 60x quicker whilst being a slightly
> faster too?, click here
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/MSM-Is-there-any-interest-in-C-14-Boost-MSM-eUML-like-library-which-compiles-up-to-60x-quicker-whils-tp4683016p4683179.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk