Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Test results marked as failure without errors
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-02-15 11:12:05


On 02/15/2016 12:50 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On 13-Feb-16 3:20 PM, Abel Sinkovics wrote:
>> Both the compile and link steps succeed and there is nothing about the
>> execution of the compiled code. Does someone know
>> why these are marked as failures?
> Hi Abel,
> I'll try to figure why there is failure without no output, but don't yet
> know how long it will take me.
> In the meantime, is there a chance you'd run these tests locally and see
> what's wrong?

  I know what the problem is, but fixing it is
non-trivial. process_jam_log randomly picks
one compilation, for targets that consist of
more than one translation unit. This is a side-effect
of handling incremental builds, which discards
an existing compile log when it finds a new one.
i.e. the last one that it sees will be the only
one shown.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at