Re: [boost] What's wrong with this benchmark

Subject: Re: [boost] What's wrong with this benchmark
From: Thorsten Ottosen (tottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-02-18 08:53:21

On 16-02-2016 18:56, Benedek Thaler wrote:
> Dear Boost,
>
> In a previous mail, I introduced a container library, `double_ended`.
> This library has benchmarks [0]. However, the benchmarks show
> unexpected results.

Some other comments:

If you do a benchmark without reserve, you should configure devector to 
use the same growth factor/initial size as the std/boost equivalent.
This is platform dependent, so one test per library is needed.

For the reserve test, we should expect very similar results across all 
platforms. If not, something appears to be wrong.

-Thorsten