Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] What's wrong with this benchmark
From: Benedek Thaler (thalerbenedek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-02-20 11:53:18


On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Michael Marcin <mike.marcin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 2/19/2016 12:48 AM, Benedek Thaler wrote:
>
> FWIW (probably not much this time)
>
> I took a shot at porting my test to the google/benchmark library.
> Mostly just to learn the library but also to see if there were any glaring
> discrepancies.
> Not sure I'm using it right but the relative results seem in line with my
> expectations.
>
> results:
> http://codepad.org/U66O82X8
>
> source:
> http://codepad.org/rii3BHly
>

Marcin,
Thanks for this take, I like this framework. Looking at the results,
I'm wondering whether it would be more informative to just show the
generated code instead of the raw numbers and say: the code is
similar, the user can expect similar performance.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk