Re: [boost] [Experimental Boost.DI] [v1.0.0 released] [Looking for a Review Manager] Your C+14 Dependency Injection library with no overhead and compile time creation guarantee!

Subject: Re: [boost] [Experimental Boost.DI] [v1.0.0 released] [Looking for a Review Manager] Your C+14 Dependency Injection library with no overhead and compile time creation guarantee!
From: Dominique Devienne (ddevienne_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-02-24 08:33:46

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Krzysztof Jusiak <krzysztof_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Andrey Semashev <
> andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]
> > Anyway, on this note, I really do not understand why requirement of Java
> > Script is such a big thing?
>
> There are two aspects to this. First is conceptual. Using JS where
> static content can and should be used is just wasteful in terms of
> client performance and battery life.

OTOH, statically styled code is bigger, sometimes quite a bit.
So assuming the JS to style it is both small and cached, dynamically
styled code can lead to less network IO overall. My $0.02. --DD