Re: [boost] [Experimental Boost.DI] [v1.0.0 released] [Looking for a Review Manager] Your C+14 Dependency Injection library with no overhead and compile time creation guarantee!

Subject: Re: [boost] [Experimental Boost.DI] [v1.0.0 released] [Looking for a Review Manager] Your C+14 Dependency Injection library with no overhead and compile time creation guarantee!
From: Krzysztof Jusiak (krzysztof_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-02-25 10:25:07

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> AMDG
>
> On 02/24/2016 07:07 AM, Krzysztof Jusiak wrote:
> >
> > Furthermore, If it comes to JS you can change the style/theme online.
> > Imagine
> > someone doesn't like the highlighting provided and would like a different
> > one. With the static
> > solution, another version of the website would have to be provided. JS +
> > CSS let you change
> > it dynamically.
> >
>
>   I have a hard time imagining anyone bothering
> to fiddle with the highlighting settings like
> this.  In any case, if your static html includes
> a fixed color scheme, you're doing it wrong.
> The actual colors should be set in CSS regardless
> of whether you're using JS or not.
>
>
Yea, most of the stuff will be handled by CSS, however, you have to add
tags for the keywords in the code.
Either way it's not giving you a possibility to change it, so it doesn't
really from the user perspective, I guess.

Anyway, I have prepared a Boost-like version of the documentation (based on
Paul's boost theme) which does not require JS, so please check it out.
http://boost-experimental.github.io/di/boost/

It still require some tweaks, but it's usable already.

> In Christ,
> Steven Watanabe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>