Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc16] Static Map Competency test
From: Karim Tarabishy (tarabishy_2020_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-02-28 05:06:19

> It's not bad. But you can do better, and *much* better if you use a
> C++ 1z (17) compiler.

So the better error part is related to using a better compiler? this is not
related to how I write my code or it is? It is just I did not pass on an
elegant compiler error requirement before and I wanted to know if this is
something related to the way I write the template function or just using a
better compiler?

> The "prove" is in bold for a reason: I want to see proof

So I had generated the assembly before and found that there is no assembly
code for the function when it is called in a constexpr context, on the other
hand it is inlined and code exist when it is called in non constexpr
context. So the proof is just uploading the assembly code?

View this message in context:
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at