Subject: Re: [boost] Alternative names to Boost.Fit
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-05 13:00:15
On 3/5/16 8:25 AM, Paul Fultz II wrote:
>> Shortening the name creates confusion, makes code less readable. Since
>> most of the library is defined inside the namespace, it doesn't really
>> add any typing. In those cases where the typing does get long, one can
>> at a (local) alias.
> However, you can't namespace alias a macro though.
Hmmm - you can't? Cant you just use
#define MY_SHORTNAME RIDICUOUSLY_LONG_NAME
MYSHORTNAME(X) in place of RIDICUOUSLY_LONG_NAME(X)
I seem to recall this working. Even if you can't, I'd say the benefit
of an abbreviation isn't worth the confusion it causes.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk