Subject: Re: [boost] 32/64 library name conflict under Windows?
From: Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-08 06:15:30
On 8 March 2016 at 11:45, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> KISS (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle is *my* default
> So I favour option A.
I agree. I've been annoyed by this issue for years (because tools like
Cmake can't automatically find which version to link because Boost doesn't
give a default logic to find which arch are these binaries).
Last time there was a discussion, most people agreed something should be
done but there
was no concensus on what to do exactly (nor was there a specific proposal).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk