Re: [boost] 32/64 library name conflict under Windows?

Subject: Re: [boost] 32/64 library name conflict under Windows?
From: Klaim - Joël Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-08 06:15:30

On 8 March 2016 at 11:45, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
> KISS (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle  is *my* default
> position).
>
> So I favour option A.
>

I agree. I've been annoyed by this issue for years (because tools like
Cmake can't automatically find which version to link because Boost doesn't
give a default logic to find which arch are these binaries).
Last time there was a discussion, most people agreed something should be
done but there
was no concensus on what to do exactly (nor was there a specific proposal).

Joël Lamotte