Subject: Re: [boost] 32/64 library name conflict under Windows?
From: Daniela Engert (dani_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-08 12:16:02
Am 08.03.2016 um 05:18 schrieb Rene Rivera:
> D) Having the current names and placing 32 bit address-model variants in
> "stage/lib32" and 64 bit in "stage/lib64"? (Equivalently for install
I prefer option D because this is how I deploy Boost in our company
since 2009. Until today I rename 'lib' to 'lib$(PlatformArchitecture)'
by hand before deployment.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk