Subject: Re: [boost] 32/64 library name conflict under Windows?
From: Rob Stewart (rstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-09 14:49:15
On March 9, 2016 5:53:08 AM EST, "Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte" <mjklaim_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>On 9 March 2016 at 10:35, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]>
>> If some people want to split into arch-based folders /x86 /x64 /arm
>> then can't they easily do this at library build time
>> "To use a different directory pass the
>> option to b2."
>> A few typical build command lines could be provided to help?
>If arch type is not somewhere by default (that is, boost distribution
>officially put these files somewhere clear
>and identifiable), it means that the tools can't rely on a specific
>path to find the right binaries.
What tools rely on Boost to put libraries in some official location?
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk