Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] 32/64 library name conflict under Windows?
From: Rob Stewart (rstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-09 14:49:15


On March 9, 2016 5:53:08 AM EST, "Klaim - Joël Lamotte" <mjklaim_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>On 9 March 2016 at 10:35, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]>
>wrote:
>
>> If some people want to split into arch-based folders /x86 /x64 /arm
>...,
>> then can't they easily do this at library build time
>>
>http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_60_0/more/getting_started/windows.html#install-boost-build
>>
>> "To use a different directory pass the
>> --stagedir=directory
>> option to b2."
>>
>> A few typical build command lines could be provided to help?
>>
>If arch type is not somewhere by default (that is, boost distribution
>officially put these files somewhere clear
>and identifiable), it means that the tools can't rely on a specific
>path to find the right binaries.

What tools rely on Boost to put libraries in some official location?

___
Rob

(Sent from my portable computation engine)


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk