Subject: Re: [boost] 32/64 library name conflict under Windows?
From: Rob Stewart (rstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-09 14:49:15
On March 9, 2016 5:53:08 AM EST, "Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte" <mjklaim_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>On 9 March 2016 at 10:35, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]>
>> If some people want to split into arch-based folders /x86 /x64 /arm
>> then can't they easily do this at library build time
>> "To use a different directory pass the
>> option to b2."
>> A few typical build command lines could be provided to help?
>If arch type is not somewhere by default (that is, boost distribution
>officially put these files somewhere clear
>and identifiable), it means that the tools can't rely on a specific
>path to find the right binaries.
What tools rely on Boost to put libraries in some official location?
(Sent from my portable computation engine)