Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [ann] C++ Archive Network
From: Jens Weller (JensWeller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-15 16:49:59

> Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. März 2016 um 14:46 Uhr
> Von: "Egor Pugin" <egor.pugin_at_[hidden]>
> An: boost_at_[hidden]
> Betreff: Re: [boost] [ann] C++ Archive Network
> > Side note: you will not gain any friends here by publishing your code under
> > GPL (which could also be the reason why nobody responded to your email so
> > far).
> I'm publishing the package manager. Client (GPL-ed) is only a tool.
> At the moment I'm the only author of client, so it can be relicensed
> very easily.
> What do you suggest? Boost license (as we're in this list)? MIT? BSD?

I think for a standalone application its ok to be GPL.
But probably you should make the functionality of your package manager available as a library in LGPL/MIT/BSD/boost.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at