Subject: Re: [boost] [Fit] Formal review / Kris
From: Louis Dionne (ldionne.2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-20 11:15:17
Paul Fultz II wrote
> Yes, I have run a couple of local tests to test performance. I could pull
> together some report to put in the documentation. Ideally. it would be
> good to
> have a comparison with other libraries as well. I haven't compared it with
> Hana yet, either, which would be a good idea. However, I do know that the
> implementation of `fit::conditional` is much faster than the implemenation
> used for `overload_linearly` in Hana, but I haven't done a direct
> I'll try to add something like that. I think it will be useful.
How so? The implementations are very similar, except Hana also allows
for non-const function objects. I'd be grateful if you could provide a
benchmark, perhaps I could improve Hana's implementation.
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Fit-Formal-review-Kris-tp4684694p4684731.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk