Subject: Re: [boost] [fit] Mini Review (consider 1/2 or 1/4 weight)
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-20 17:16:26
Thanks Artyom for your review.
I believe you have missed the goal of the library, but this re-enforce
the idea that the library needs better document its goal.
I will take it into consideration as all the comments exchanged during
these 17 days.
Le 20/03/2016 11:05, Artyom Beilis a écrit :
> Disclaimer: please consider my review as partial if at all because of
> the way I did it (see notes below)
>> - Whether you believe the library should be accepted into Boost
> No, I don't think so.
> I don't feel that library adds any real value to boost: being useful
> or in other words
> significantly simplifying rather straight forward tasks can't be done
> However I understand that there are some cases with template meta-programming
> that can make library useful shown there:
> So I do think it another major review after significant redesign can be done.
>> - Your name
> Artyom Beilis
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk