Re: [boost] [fit] Mini Review (consider 1/2 or 1/4 weight)

Subject: Re: [boost] [fit] Mini Review (consider 1/2 or 1/4 weight)
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-20 17:16:26

Thanks Artyom for your review.

I believe you have missed the goal of the library, but this re-enforce 
the idea that the library needs better document its goal.

I will take it into consideration as all the comments exchanged during 
these 17 days.

Best,
Vicente

Le 20/03/2016 11:05, Artyom Beilis a écrit :
> Disclaimer: please consider my review as partial if at all because of
> the way I did it (see notes below)
>
>> - Whether you believe the library should be accepted into Boost
> No, I don't think so.
>
> I don't feel that library adds any real value to boost: being useful
> or in other words
> significantly simplifying rather straight forward tasks can't be done
>
> However I understand that there are some cases with template meta-programming
> that can make library useful shown there:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/265453
>
> So I do think it another major review after significant redesign can be done.
>
>
>> - Your name
> Artyom Beilis
>