Subject: Re: [boost] [clang][preprocessor] Testing of clang emualting the VC++ preprocessor on Windows
From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-04-01 03:25:57
On 1 April 2016 at 06:47, Paul Mensonides <pmenso57_at_[hidden]> wrote:
Why do they need support? Compiler != platform.
You're right, approaching it this way. vs2015 Update 2 is the only compiler
that "needs" support, as it will compile code that runs on W7SP1, W8.1 and
W10 (as they are the M$ supported OSes). In a world of open source and free
(as in beer) compilers/OSes, this is not an issue, just upgrade to the
latest and greatest.
The latter, is M$'s goal, get the whole world on W10 and have forced
upgrades (with a 3 month delay of execution for the enterprise edition). A
lot of (in particular) companies dont' seem to like that, apparently.
VC++ being the "de facto" compiler on the platform is a huge part of the
I don't really see what you intend to say here. Their platform, their
Moreover, no C++ code should have to support any compiler whatsoever.
Boost doesn't have to support VC++ either, correct, but it does it's best
to do so.
Code should target the standard. Compilers should target the standard.
> Any temporary workarounds for bugs or missing features should be exactly
> that: temporary.
AFAIK that's what M$ is working at. Windows pre-dates Linux by over 5
years, i.e. no gcc/clang whatever. Windows predates "The Standard", you are
referring to, by 13 years. The bugs and missing features ARE temporary,
their time-frame differs from yours, though.
M$ suffers from legacy code like any other company. Being commmercial and
supporting a huge user base, I can see that they don't re-write the OS in
one go, i.e. they depend on the bad choices of the past.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk