Subject: Re: [boost] [endian] Some suggestions
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-04-12 04:51:10
On 04/11/2016 01:47 AM, Gavin Lambert wrote:
> While that's true, surely any compiler/library should treat any NaN bit
> pattern as returning true from isnan() and friends, even if it is not
> bit-identical to the NaN that the compiler/library would generate itself.
Correct, arithmetic and relational operations disregard the NaN payload;
that is by design. If, however, you use the NaN payload to convey
information, such as errors or diagnostics, then the compiler generated
payloads can cause interoperability problems.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk