Subject: Re: [boost] [CMake] what to do now?
From: Paul Fultz II (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-04-14 17:51:06
On Thursday, April 14, 2016 at 4:18:07 PM UTC-5, Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On 2016-04-14 22:00, Edward Diener wrote:
> > On 4/14/2016 1:37 PM, Rene Rivera wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Louis Dionne <ldio..._at_[hidden]
> >> wrote:
> >>> Don't overthink it. All I'm saying is that the Boost guidelines
> >>> recommend
> >>> that
> >>> CMakeLists.txt should appear in $some_library/build/CMakeLists.txt,
> >>> while I
> >>> argue that current practice is to put it in
> >>> $some_library/CMakeLists.txt.
> >> Just to be clear. It's not a recommendation. It's a requirement.
> > Ideally could not one have a CMakeLists.txt file wherever there is
> > currently a jamfile ? In the library's 'build' directory to build a
> > non-header only library, in the library's 'doc' directory to build the
> > docs, in the library's 'test' directory to run the tests etc.
> Yes, that is possible and what should be done according to the current
> guidelines. It's just not how it's typically done in other projects that
> use cmake.
The cmake files could be separated out to different directories, however
needs to be a top-level cmake to bring all of them together. This is because
cmake is more of a configuration system rather than just a build system. So
can generate files for any build systems, Makefiles, Visual Studio.
Technically, it could generate build files for boost, however, its not
supported. So first you create and configure a build directory:
Then you can invoke the build through "targets". So if you want to build the
tests you might build the 'check' target:
cmake --build . --target check
This is different than Boost.Build where you just cd into a directory and
start building. This is why a top-level cmake file is important. The cmake
file can be easily split across multiple cmake files if the library author
wants, but there needs to be one at the top-level to glue them all together.
> > My personal problem with CMake is, while the language to use it is more
> > understandable for me than 'jam', its doc is just as hard for me to
> > understand as Boost Build if not even harder <g>. Mastering yet another
> > build system which is documented mainly for those who already know what
> > it is about is not my idea of programming fun.
> Unlike Boost.Build, cmake has built in commands 'cmake --help*' which at
> least make it easier to use when you know what you're doing.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk