Subject: Re: [boost] [clang] clang-cl expansion of macros
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-04-17 11:41:47
On 17 Apr 2016 at 8:13, Edward Diener wrote:
> > The real effort behind such a patch would be navigating the internal
> > politics on getting the patch into trunk. I have no need in my own
> > code for a C99 preprocessor, hence I am not willing to invest that
> > effort. But others with a more pressing need may wish to do so.
> Why not bring up the issue on the clang developers mailing list ? Clang
> source code is not an area which Boost developers can affect in this
> mailing list, but in the clang developers mailing list you might be able
> to persuade a clang developer to listen to your suggestion(s).
That would be the "navigating the internal politics" I mentioned. I
have no current pressing need for a C99 conforming preprocessor in my
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk