Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Question about the weak_ptr constructor with lock() call
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-04-20 14:56:46

Andrey Semashev wrote:

> Maybe the cheaper (and arguably more common) version could be used when it
> is known that the virtual inheritance is not in play?

It's still undefined behavior, even though it would work.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at