Subject: Re: [boost] Boost 1.61.0 Release Candidate 1
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-06 13:05:27
[Frank Mori Hess]
> The specification change is the removal of the converting constructor for 1-tuples.
> The thing is, signals2 never did any converting construction of tuples.
> It was a straight copy construction of some templated function arguments.
> The compiler error was using the converting tuple constructor at all.
Can you please demonstrate this with a self-contained, STL-only, Boost-free repro? What you're describing doesn't correspond to the test cases I've seen. (I have the ability to reduce Boost-using repros, but it is very slow - Boost is complicated and I'm not familiar with its internals.)
I don't believe there's a bug in our implementation, but if there is, I want to know immediately so I can fix it.