Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-17 13:59:10
David Sankel wrote:
> Boost cannot evolve the way it has in the past. When it was getting
> started, we didn't have over-representation of groups who benefit from the
> status-quo. We didn't have the idea of servicing the "Boost community"
> instead of the "C++ community".
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. What is this hypothetical
"Boost community" that is supposedly being served? What are those
over-represented groups? Are you referencing something with which I am not
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk