Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: Vladimir Batov (Vladimir.Batov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-18 00:09:59
On 05/18/2016 02:01 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
> Actually this has been entertaining on a number of levels.
> Could we agree that this particular tool won't be of much use to our
Indeed. The only sensible conclusion possible. Moving on.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk