Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: alainm (alain.miniussi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-18 02:08:09
On 17/05/2016 20:11, Robert Ramey wrote:
>> the so-called top-down transition to git (which was good for C++, but
>> for insiders),
> I don't know if I qualify as an insider, but it seems to me that
> transition to Git has been a good thing and was never seen as anything
> else by anyone.
If transition to git means transition to github and modular-boost, I
know at least one person who think it's a PITA.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk