Subject: Re: [boost] Request for a "Policy Review" regarding 'CMakeLists.txt'
From: Paul Fultz II (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-18 13:02:33
On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 11:29:07 AM UTC-5, Mikhail Strelnikov wrote:
> > No, not at all. Hana searches for Boost 1.59 _or above_, because it
> > supports
> > these versions. Obviously, the CMakeLists.txt file included with Hana is
> > not
> > the CMakeLists.txt file that would be included with Hana if the Boost
> > community decided to make a move to CMake, which is not the case right
> I want to remind you that this started with "The requirement that these
> libraries not include a 'CMakeLists.txt' as part of their Boost
> distribution creates a maintenance burden for authors or otherwise hurts
> usability of the independent distribution."
> But now it is obvious Hana will need two CMakeLists.txt and somehow this
> not "a maintenance burden".
I dont think that Louis is suggesting two cmake files. Rather, if boost were
to move to cmake then the `find_package` could be used to find the actual
boost targets rather then relying on cmake to reverse engineer the
And, like I said in a previous email, a special `boost_find_package`
could be added(or we could override `find_package`) to search for internal
dependencies, which will allow the same cmake file for both standalone and
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk