Re: [boost] Boost Evolution

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-20 08:05:25

On 19 May 2016 at 11:24, Rob Stewart wrote:

> There is, obviously, a vocal contingent asking for more., and
> that may well be an important, even necessary, change. Specific
> proposals for changes to the  SC, or for the creation of a new board,
> are reasonable but they would need wide support in the community, not
> just from a vocal few. 

Average the age of the vocal contingent. You might find it 
illustrative.

Also note the strong correlation between the vocal contingent and 
those working on C++ 14 only libraries.

The whole point of a proactive leadership is that they DON'T follow 
the masses. Most will be indifferent. Making Boost great again 
requires decisions not backed by a positive mass vote.

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ 
http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/