Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-20 08:05:25
On 19 May 2016 at 11:24, Rob Stewart wrote:
> There is, obviously, a vocal contingent asking for more., and
> that may well be an important, even necessary, change. Specific
> proposals for changes to the SC, or for the creation of a new board,
> are reasonable but they would need wide support in the community, not
> just from a vocal few.
Average the age of the vocal contingent. You might find it
Also note the strong correlation between the vocal contingent and
those working on C++ 14 only libraries.
The whole point of a proactive leadership is that they DON'T follow
the masses. Most will be indifferent. Making Boost great again
requires decisions not backed by a positive mass vote.
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk