Subject: Re: [boost] Boost 2.0 ideas (was Re: Boost is supposed to serve *the entire C++ community; it isn't Boost's goal to serve Boost's c
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-20 11:55:30
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> So my counter-proposal (which I have repeatedly voiced over past years)
> would be to let Boost evolve into an *umbrella organization* with a
> relatively high degree of autonomy for *member projects* to decide for
> their own on things like what infrastructure tools to use (to build, test,
> document, to track issues and feature requests, etc.), so long as certain
> quality standards are maintained.
And what will this umbrella organization actually *do*?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk