Re: [boost] Boost 2.0 ideas (was Re: Boost is supposed to serve *the entire C++ community; it isn't Boost's goal to serve Boost's c

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost 2.0 ideas (was Re: Boost is supposed to serve *the entire C++ community; it isn't Boost's goal to serve Boost's c
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-20 11:55:30

Stefan Seefeld wrote:

> So my counter-proposal (which I have repeatedly voiced over past years) 
> would be to let Boost evolve into an *umbrella organization* with a 
> relatively high degree of autonomy for *member projects* to decide for 
> their own on things like what infrastructure tools to use (to build, test, 
> document, to track issues and feature requests, etc.), so long as certain 
> quality standards are maintained.

And what will this umbrella organization actually *do*?