|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fit review Mars 3-20 result
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-20 18:22:34
On 5/20/16 11:14 AM, Ronald Garcia wrote:
>
>> On May 20, 2016, at 10:30 AM, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/20/16 9:17 AM, Glen Fernandes wrote:
>>> Robert Ramey wrote:
>>>> Agreed.
>>>>
>>>> Just leave everything in suspended animation until you make the final
>>>> report.
>>>>
>>>> Note to future reviewers: Reveal whole review or nothing at all. Your
>>>> life will be easier.
>>>
>>> *Nod*.
>>>
>>> Is the AFIO review taking the "or nothing at all" route, then?
>>
>> I think that's a whole 'nuther question. The review wizard should chase this down and bug the reviewer for some sort of official resolution to the status.
>>
> Already done. Ideally you should see some movement on this soon.
I just wanted to take the opportunity to note what a great job you've
done over the last 13? years. I know you're going to say it's not a
huge job it's not that time consuming its not a big deal, etc.
BUT it is a big and important job. The fact that you get on it and keep
it up to date makes it (look?) easy. If you didn't do this as well as
you do, we'd have yet another rolling fiasco on our hands. Ironies of
ironies, the better job one does, the easier it is made to look and the
less it's appreciated. Not fair, but still better than constant excuses,
complaints and other drama. If more people did as you do, we'd be better
off.
Robert Ramey
>
> Best,
> Ron
>
>
>> Robert Ramey
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk