Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] What C++14/1z standard or TS libraries would you like to have available on a C++11 compiler?
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-22 14:10:03

Next message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "[boost] Boost 2.x - (Was Re: Boost is supposed to serve *the entire C++ community; it isn't Boost's goal to serve Boost's community*)"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] doctest - the lightest feature rich C++ single header testing framework - if it can enter boost and if it/boost will benefit from that"
In reply to: Thijs (M.A.) van den Berg: "Re: [boost] What C++14/1z standard or TS libraries would you like to have available on a C++11 compiler?"
Next in thread: Edward Diener: "Re: [boost] What C++14/1z standard or TS libraries would you like to have available on a C++11 compiler?"

Le 22/05/2016 à 19:53, Thijs (M.A.) van den Berg a écrit :
>
>> On 22 May 2016, at 19:06, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:.
>>
>> I would like to reduce dependencies to Boost libraries as much as possible.
>>
> Why?
Because Boost 1.x is too monolitic.
> Will it e.g. be released outside boost?
Why not? I believe that this should be useful also to on)boost users.
>
> Wouldn't it have to be *completely* independent in that case?
I could admit some configuration dependencies that can be avoided easily
when delivered standalone.

Vicente

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk