Re: [boost] [optional] using name boost::in_place -- need your opinion/advice

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] using name boost::in_place -- need your opinion/advice
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-30 06:46:59

On Monday, 30 May 2016 13:45:28 MSK Krzysztof Czainski 
wrote:
> 2016-05-30 11:29 GMT+02:00 Andrey Semashev 
<andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:
> 
> > The typed in-place
> > factories ruin the solution though, even if not used by 
optional.
> 
> How so?

Typed in-place factory requires an explicit template parameter 
to be specified, which is not achievable if in_place is an object.