Subject: Re: [boost] A retrospect on 'CMakeLists.txt' policy review
From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-06-01 10:02:43
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Michael Caisse <mcaisse-lists_at_[hidden]>
> On 6/1/16 01:29, Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 1 June 2016 11:28:12 MSK David
>> Sankel wrote:
>>> Here is my take away. No one is arguing that the
>> current guidelines
>>> disallow authors from placing a CMakeLists.txt in the
>> root of their
>>> library's directory.
>> I think Rene said that this was not prohibited multiple
>> times in the discussion.
> We are having this discussion because there might have been confusion on
> what Rene meant here:
I don't think that's the only reason we are having that discussion ;-)
Perhaps I should have been more clear at that time :-\ I wasn't trying to
exclude the latter part of the statement I quoted. I was trying to clarify
that it's a requirement to have build/CMakeLists.txt (or build/makefile, or
build/vs2012.prj, or build/SConstruct, etc) as opposed to a recommendation.
Which I think I made clear at some point in the conversation currently in
-- -- Rene Rivera -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Robot Dreams - http://robot-dreams.net -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk